Okay so this post is not like the normal posts about atheism, science or skepticism. I have an interest in Philosophy and this is my response to a Philosophical competition question entitled 'Should trees have rights?' in which the response had to be 180 words or less. Don't worry I am not saying trees have feelings! Here it is:
Trees do have rights to an extent, they have rights given by
humans, legal rights protecting them. But these are not personal rights for the
trees, they are rights that inhibit our actions towards the tree. Trees are vital for the existence of us
humans and so we need to protect them in order to maintain our existence. These
rights are man-made and artificial created and applied by humans to maintain
society and the environment in what we believe to be a humane way. The ecological
balance of nature requires no human rights to be implemented, it works prefect
on its own from the subatomic level to the global scale. The very rights that
protect trees allow for their destruction. But trees like everything in the
world are protected by the fundamental laws of science and nature and these are
the rights that are important to trees.
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Friday, 18 January 2013
The Beauty And Science Of Water
Please like my Facebook page: The Blogging Skeptic
With all the snow disruptions hitting the UK I thought I would look at the science behind water.
Water is the most important chemical compound on our planet, it covers 71% of our planet and is vital for all life. Water is a covalently bonded polar molecule, with the oxygen being slightly negative and the hydrogen being slightly positive with hydrogen bonding between molecules.
The properties of H2O make it perfect for providing life. Water has a high latent heat of vaporisation which put simply means that when water becomes a gas it removes energy from the source of where the water was. So when animals sweat energy is removed from the body and homoeostasis is maintained. Also, water has a high specific heat capacity which put simply again means it takes a lot of energy to raise a kg of water by 1 degrees Celsius. This means that water remains at a fairly constant temperature in large amounts which is vital for ensuring life continues by the little variation in oceans and seas.
With all the snow disruptions hitting the UK I thought I would look at the science behind water.
Water is the most important chemical compound on our planet, it covers 71% of our planet and is vital for all life. Water is a covalently bonded polar molecule, with the oxygen being slightly negative and the hydrogen being slightly positive with hydrogen bonding between molecules.
The properties of H2O make it perfect for providing life. Water has a high latent heat of vaporisation which put simply means that when water becomes a gas it removes energy from the source of where the water was. So when animals sweat energy is removed from the body and homoeostasis is maintained. Also, water has a high specific heat capacity which put simply again means it takes a lot of energy to raise a kg of water by 1 degrees Celsius. This means that water remains at a fairly constant temperature in large amounts which is vital for ensuring life continues by the little variation in oceans and seas.
Tuesday, 15 January 2013
Tolerance Within The Atheist Community
The atheist
community is always busy fighting against the inequalities of religion across the world and I believe sometimes we need to step back and take a look
at the whole picture. One of the readers of this blog suggested I write about tolerance
within the atheist community for religion and this is my response.
Whilst there
are of course horrifically disturbing religious discriminations happening right
now, what about the ‘normal’ and peaceful religion that is being practised? As
atheists how should we react to them? I enjoy a good old heated debate, but
arguing at every moment possible is not the right thing to do. Sometimes leaving
a religious person with their faith is fine, if they start preaching about
their beliefs to you then please feel free to intervene and talk about your
well backed up beliefs. After all, well backed up ideas are always better than
preaching. Debating will probably not get you anywhere, as the religious person
already has beliefs that are based on faith. And evidence only destroys faith. As long as the debaters respect each
other’s views no harm can be done, debating correctly allows respect and critique of views.
Tuesday, 1 January 2013
Looking Back...Science Highlights of 2012
2012 was certainly a great year in terms of science, as per usual many amazing advances in the scientific community were made. Here are some of the highlights...
1.) Probably the most famous in 2012 was the discovery of the previously theoretical Higgs Boson. Its discovery gave particle physics a great leap in knowledge and positively raised its awareness and educated the general public.
2.) Just above I said the discovery of the Higgs Boson was the most famous, I guess the next event is globally even more well-known about. In October, Felix Baumgartner skydived from the 'edge of space' and fell faster than the speed of sound. Despite some difficulty that he experienced he successfully completed the dive.
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
A Blogging Skeptic's Atheist Christmas
Only 6 days till…well
you know what. It’s Christmas! The awkward time of the year for atheists- the
decision whether to celebrate it is a sensitive issue for many atheists. It is
the balance between family, sentiment and personal objection to this religious
holiday that many find difficult.
Whilst some
object altogether about celebrating this holiday there are others who
celebrate what is becoming an increasingly secularised celebration. With
atheist participation in Christmas it highlights and increases the awareness that
this event is a somewhat secular holiday. Even if you don’t want to celebrate
Christmas per se, why not celebrate the fact it is a public holiday. Or make up
your own celebration- the birth of Richard Dawkins perhaps? Who cares if Dawkin’s
was born in March it makes perfect sense to celebrate it in December, after all Jesus wasn't born in December!
Now onto Tim
Minchin and his brilliantly crafted and intelligent exploration into a
Christmas for non-believers. Although this song was released in 2009, it never
ceases to fade in its magnificence and is still my number 1 Christmas song each
year. The song portrays Tim’s feelings about how
Christmas is still important to non-religious people and the sentient, along
with sharing time with your family is important.
Whatever your views and whatever holiday you will be celebrating, Happy Holiday and Merry Chri...HOLIDAY!- From The Blogging Skeptic
Whatever your views and whatever holiday you will be celebrating, Happy Holiday and Merry Chri...HOLIDAY!- From The Blogging Skeptic
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
Derren Brown Part 2- Religious Experience
As promised,
here is my response to Derren Brown’s ‘Faith’ show. The shows are still on 4oD
if you wish to watch them.
In this
programme Derren Brown demonstrates how a ‘religious experience’ can be induced
on someone, in this case a stem-cell scientist and a strong atheist. It was a
fascinating show because Derren was not presenting full conclusive evidence for
the non-existence of God(s) but exploring that the belief in God could stem
from our humanistic needs and is hard-wired into us.
The concept
of a God was always going to be applied by humans to explain the world no
matter whether it was true or not, centuries ago humans knew very little about
the world around them and the need to be able to explain the world was
essential to the basics of living. As Derren showed in this programme we are
all susceptible to suggestions of a supernatural presence, in essence it is
hard wired into every one of us. He used several experiments on members of his
audience to demonstrate this. He performed a satanic ritual where the person
read out a satanic rite declaring their allegiance to Satan, out of an audience
consisting of mainly atheists, agnostics and skeptics only a few were willing
to perform it- 11 out of 160. As Derren after this said “we are all born with
an inbuilt hardwired tendency to believe,” and it was that niggling doubt in
the back of their minds that made them not decide to partake.
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
Derren Brown Part 1- Placebo Effect
In this post
and the next I am exploring Derren Brown’s ‘Fear and Faith’ shows. I am looking
at part 1, ‘fear’ which examines the placebo effect. The first show was
broadcasted on Friday 9th November, apologies for time delay. The
shows are still on 4oD if you wish to watch them.
In the
programme, at first Derren Brown reveals a drug ‘Rumyodin’ that inhibits fear;
it had been used within the U.S army and now they had the permission to use the
drug on a clinical level for a select few members of the public. After several
minutes he reveals that it is in fact a fake, the drug does not exist and it is
simply an elaborate façade for a placebo pill. Derren cleverly created the name
‘Rumyodin’ which is actually an anagram of ‘your mind.' After this
it shows Derren leading several people into Cicero’s (the fake company) medical
centre and the placebo effect has already begun with the professionalism of the
trials and the medical centre.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)